Now Playing Tracks

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

They were probably just horsing around on the commentary, but I could totally see Beckett and Espo having had a thing. Before Ryan showed up, both new to the job they ended up sleeping together. But then were mutually like 'hey, that was a lot of fun but we probably make better friends'. I would totally be on board for a character back story like that. And I don't think having sex changes Beckett's and Epso's 'bromance' type relationship or their characterization. But *shrugs*

writingonthecastlewalls:

always-caskett-41319:

writingonthecastlewalls:

always-caskett-41319:

writingonthecastlewalls:

Yeah, it’s completely possible to have had like, a little one off, or short term thing, and then just be like, eh. I don’t really get the idea that it ruins their characters, or the relationship or anything like that. That’s taking it a bit far, to me. People do, in fact physical relationships and then decide that they would make better friends.

That said, one of the reasons I was never particularly fond of that interpretation is because actually, that sort of structure gets used a lot. “The reason they’re close is because they have some sort of sexual history to give them intimacy” - and I really like the idea that Esposito and Beckett sort of came to that on their own, through something other than sex because it IS a common, easy construction.

What I actually find in relation to the commentary – and I said this somewhere else, although I’m not sure what order these will pop out of the queue at the moment – is that the conversation was instigated by Ryan. Bringing that up in a context to razz Espo with it, where presumably Castle and Beckett would see it? It’s much odder/more awkward bring it up if it’s true then it is to suggest they may have just been doing it to get a rise out of the other two. To me at least.

So yeah it’s not my favorite thing in the entire world for a couple of specific reasons, and I do think there are a lot of explanations, and that even if it was intentionally waited in the commentary, that doesn’t necessarily make it true in story – extras rarely are unless they come up again in an episode. But the level of reaction it’s getting in some quarters is much stronger than I would have expected.

My problem with it is that both Andrew and Stana both seem extremely uncomfortable when people bring up this potential history between Esposito and Kate. Like at the Paley event when it was brought up you could see that Stana and Andrew were annoyed and not exactly comfortable with it, but Jon seems to be all for it. I also think for Jon it might actually be something he has considered to have happened in his mind because it’s not always joking. Most recently he said in an article how he would love to explore those two character’s relationship in the past hinting that there is more to it. 

I’ve just never loved the storyline and I never really saw Kate and Espo’s relationship as any different than Kate and Ryan’s. I think that people get these ideas for a romantic past due to the fact that Espo seems more protective of Kate than Ryan does, but that’s just Espo’s personality. He’s protective of everyone, we even saw that nature come out with Kay Cappuchio. 

I just don’t like it at all and even if they were joking, think that it’s something that shouldn’t be on something official like a Castle DVD

And I’m definitely not adverse to your thinking there, either. Although I think “romantic past” is probably overselling the way I’ve heard him express it.

Yeah I’m using ‘romantic’ loosely. I mean anything more than just friends and just friends wouldn’t have that physical type relationship. Plus the fact that if this is not just joking around, which I do think it is, Espo needed time to get past it which to me suggests more than just physical. 

But I definitely think this is just a joke that is getting old and has been taken too far

If I remember correctly, the original format of it was they went out to celebrate after a case and had a drunken one night stand, then agreed it would never happen again?

Personally, I think they were just hamming it up as characters for the commentary, the way it said doesn’t sound like he’s actually trying to get over anything at all. It looks different in the transcript then it sounds I think.

Maybe. Haven’t listened to it and probably never will. As a fan of the show though, I would prefer it stops. I think it’s gone on long enough and it’s just not funny anymore imo, not that it was funny to start with, but even less so now

the-fourteenth-of-august:

mrs-c-to-be:

die-oxiide:

writer-monkey47:

Excuse me, nony, could I have your attention for a moment, please? First of all, I’d like to inform you that your cowardly anonymous comment you made to my dear friend rickate-kateick-caskett was one of the stupidest damn things I’ve read in a while. This is called an opinion, and in case you are unaware, I am entitled to have one. Shocker, right!?! Hold on just a sec, I wanna review your comment again. Oh look, I have it right here:

"No offense, but if you don’t want to be spoiled, stay off of a spoiler intensive website until after that show premieres, no one else blogs for your convenience and sometimes people forget… If you don’t use tumblr you won’t get spoiled. Just being real, the person blogging really isn’t thinking about spoiling others. Accidents happen and so does people simply not caring."

Okay, nony. I would love to tell you a story, so let’s look at it this way:

You are strolling through the city enjoying your evening when *BAM* out of nowhere you are shot by some random low life street mugger desperate to get their hands on some cash. You’re slumped over, bleeding profusely, and it’s terrible that this has happened to you, but you do know this situation could have been avoided, right? No offense, but if you don’t want shot, you should avoid a city with a high crime rate until it’s deemed a little safer. No one plans their crime around you or your convenience. If you don’t venture into the city, you won’t get shot. Just being real, the person doing the mugging isn’t thinking about sparing others… They have their own agenda… Anyway, miraculously, I’m nearby and hear you calling for help. I run up to you & you’re asking me to call an ambulance, to help you, to save you. So, what do I do? I call 911 & begin applying pressure to the wound. Why do I do this? Well, first of all, you asked me to, but mainly because it’s the morally correct and appropriate thing to do. It shows my respect for you as a human being. Any blogger has the right to ask us to tag spoilers just as you had the right to ask for my help. It is morally correct & respectful for us to do as they’ve asked just as it was morally correct & respectful for me to do what you asked. I mean, I did help save your life…

Why should you have to sacrifice your lovely evening stroll through the city for fear of getting mugged? Wait, what’s that?? You shouldn’t have to make that sacrifice?? That’s what I was thinking!! So, why should she have to sacrifice her lovely evening scroll through tumblr to avoid getting spoiled? Wow, cricket silence really is awkward…

I guess the moral to this whole story is: Treat others how you would want to be treated. It’s called RESPECT… go get some… I’m also aware that you are entitled to your own opinion as well, and if you ever feel the need to rant & express your douchey opinion ever again, feel free to visit my inbox and leave her alone. She’s a nice person who doesn’t deserve to be called out & upset by some asshole anon.
I, however, am not nearly as nice as she is & I would really get a kick out of interacting with your dumb ass!!

Enjoy the rest of your night, nony!
Don’t forget to tag your #spoilers 😊

it’s really not that serious. ur going so hard for no reason lmfaooo. that anon is correct. this is a spoiler intensive website and the best way to avoid spoilers is to stay off of it. and by the way, ur just as bad as that anon for calling him/her names. lmaoooo. I really hate that a majority of this fandom is 14-16 year olds.

You need to calm down first off, that example in no way is correlated to spoilers and calling an anon a douche and talking shit makes you twice as bad. You didn’t even receive the anon so pipe down. That anon is correct sure it’s “respectful” to tag spoilers but it’s also common sense not use tumblr a place filled with spoilers. With giving that example I’m not sure what side you are choosing because if you do walk down a city street that is the risk you are taking but why the hell are you so offended by an ANON , who really didn’t say anything rude and to a comment that wasn’t even directly made to you. You’re being a hypocrite you keep telling people they have the right to have their on opinion, but you talk shit about there opinion and you are DIRECTING others to tag their spoilers and not respecting their right as a blogger. When you piss people off they will purposely not tag their spoilers so honestly you’re bound to get spoiled. I know that if you were talking about me like that I would not take the courtesy in tagging anything. Let people have an opinion, you can’t tell someone what to do and then say don’t tell me what to do. I cannot believe you correlated getting shot to posting spoilers lmfao you’re out of control.

Thank you^ that person failed to make their argument with that example. Those things are two completely different situations and plus getting shot in the city? Are you kidding me? That anon was actually nice. Thats literally the most respectful ask I’ve seen from an anon about spoilers. Mostly I see anons start cursing the person out. Secondly, if you really don’t want spoilers, stay off tumblr. 

I completely agree with this. If you truly don’t want to be spoiled, then don’t go on a social media site where there are spoilers because not everyone is going to tag their spoilers. I personally am a spoiler blog and don’t tag my spoilers. I could never remember to start with so I just stopped even trying to remember. It’s pretty clear that my tumblr isn’t spoiler free, even my twitter isn’t spoiler free so if you don’t want to get spoiled don’t follow my blog. It’s as simple as something like this… if you don’t want to get bitten by a shark… don’t swim in shark invested waters. If you don’t want to get spoiled… don’t go on a spoiler invested site. 

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

They were probably just horsing around on the commentary, but I could totally see Beckett and Espo having had a thing. Before Ryan showed up, both new to the job they ended up sleeping together. But then were mutually like 'hey, that was a lot of fun but we probably make better friends'. I would totally be on board for a character back story like that. And I don't think having sex changes Beckett's and Epso's 'bromance' type relationship or their characterization. But *shrugs*

writingonthecastlewalls:

always-caskett-41319:

writingonthecastlewalls:

Yeah, it’s completely possible to have had like, a little one off, or short term thing, and then just be like, eh. I don’t really get the idea that it ruins their characters, or the relationship or anything like that. That’s taking it a bit far, to me. People do, in fact physical relationships and then decide that they would make better friends.

That said, one of the reasons I was never particularly fond of that interpretation is because actually, that sort of structure gets used a lot. “The reason they’re close is because they have some sort of sexual history to give them intimacy” - and I really like the idea that Esposito and Beckett sort of came to that on their own, through something other than sex because it IS a common, easy construction.

What I actually find in relation to the commentary – and I said this somewhere else, although I’m not sure what order these will pop out of the queue at the moment – is that the conversation was instigated by Ryan. Bringing that up in a context to razz Espo with it, where presumably Castle and Beckett would see it? It’s much odder/more awkward bring it up if it’s true then it is to suggest they may have just been doing it to get a rise out of the other two. To me at least.

So yeah it’s not my favorite thing in the entire world for a couple of specific reasons, and I do think there are a lot of explanations, and that even if it was intentionally waited in the commentary, that doesn’t necessarily make it true in story – extras rarely are unless they come up again in an episode. But the level of reaction it’s getting in some quarters is much stronger than I would have expected.

My problem with it is that both Andrew and Stana both seem extremely uncomfortable when people bring up this potential history between Esposito and Kate. Like at the Paley event when it was brought up you could see that Stana and Andrew were annoyed and not exactly comfortable with it, but Jon seems to be all for it. I also think for Jon it might actually be something he has considered to have happened in his mind because it’s not always joking. Most recently he said in an article how he would love to explore those two character’s relationship in the past hinting that there is more to it. 

I’ve just never loved the storyline and I never really saw Kate and Espo’s relationship as any different than Kate and Ryan’s. I think that people get these ideas for a romantic past due to the fact that Espo seems more protective of Kate than Ryan does, but that’s just Espo’s personality. He’s protective of everyone, we even saw that nature come out with Kay Cappuchio. 

I just don’t like it at all and even if they were joking, think that it’s something that shouldn’t be on something official like a Castle DVD

And I’m definitely not adverse to your thinking there, either. Although I think “romantic past” is probably overselling the way I’ve heard him express it.

Yeah I’m using ‘romantic’ loosely. I mean anything more than just friends and just friends wouldn’t have that physical type relationship. Plus the fact that if this is not just joking around, which I do think it is, Espo needed time to get past it which to me suggests more than just physical. 

But I definitely think this is just a joke that is getting old and has been taken too far

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

They were probably just horsing around on the commentary, but I could totally see Beckett and Espo having had a thing. Before Ryan showed up, both new to the job they ended up sleeping together. But then were mutually like 'hey, that was a lot of fun but we probably make better friends'. I would totally be on board for a character back story like that. And I don't think having sex changes Beckett's and Epso's 'bromance' type relationship or their characterization. But *shrugs*

writingonthecastlewalls:

Yeah, it’s completely possible to have had like, a little one off, or short term thing, and then just be like, eh. I don’t really get the idea that it ruins their characters, or the relationship or anything like that. That’s taking it a bit far, to me. People do, in fact physical relationships and then decide that they would make better friends.

That said, one of the reasons I was never particularly fond of that interpretation is because actually, that sort of structure gets used a lot. “The reason they’re close is because they have some sort of sexual history to give them intimacy” - and I really like the idea that Esposito and Beckett sort of came to that on their own, through something other than sex because it IS a common, easy construction.

What I actually find in relation to the commentary – and I said this somewhere else, although I’m not sure what order these will pop out of the queue at the moment – is that the conversation was instigated by Ryan. Bringing that up in a context to razz Espo with it, where presumably Castle and Beckett would see it? It’s much odder/more awkward bring it up if it’s true then it is to suggest they may have just been doing it to get a rise out of the other two. To me at least.

So yeah it’s not my favorite thing in the entire world for a couple of specific reasons, and I do think there are a lot of explanations, and that even if it was intentionally waited in the commentary, that doesn’t necessarily make it true in story – extras rarely are unless they come up again in an episode. But the level of reaction it’s getting in some quarters is much stronger than I would have expected.

My problem with it is that both Andrew and Stana both seem extremely uncomfortable when people bring up this potential history between Esposito and Kate. Like at the Paley event when it was brought up you could see that Stana and Andrew were annoyed and not exactly comfortable with it, but Jon seems to be all for it. I also think for Jon it might actually be something he has considered to have happened in his mind because it’s not always joking. Most recently he said in an article how he would love to explore those two character’s relationship in the past hinting that there is more to it. 

I’ve just never loved the storyline and I never really saw Kate and Espo’s relationship as any different than Kate and Ryan’s. I think that people get these ideas for a romantic past due to the fact that Espo seems more protective of Kate than Ryan does, but that’s just Espo’s personality. He’s protective of everyone, we even saw that nature come out with Kay Cappuchio. 

I just don’t like it at all and even if they were joking, think that it’s something that shouldn’t be on something official like a Castle DVD

We make Tumblr themes